A multilaboratory comparison of calibration accuracy and the performance of external references in analytical ultracentrifugation

dc.contributor.authorZhao, Huaying
dc.contributor.authorGhirlando, Rodolfo
dc.contributor.authorAlfonso, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorArisaka, Fumio
dc.contributor.authorAttali, Ilan
dc.contributor.authorBain, David L.
dc.contributor.authorBakhtina, Marina M.
dc.contributor.authorBecker, Donald F.
dc.contributor.authorBedwell, Gregory J.
dc.contributor.authorBekdemir, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorHall, Damien
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-13T22:15:36Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.updated2015-12-11T07:18:46Z
dc.description.abstractAnalytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) is a first principles based method to determine absolute sedimentation coefficients and buoyant molar masses of macromolecules and their complexes, reporting on their size and shape in free solution. The purpose of this multi-laboratory study was to establish the precision and accuracy of basic data dimensions in AUC and validate previously proposed calibration techniques. Three kits of AUC cell assemblies containing radial and temperature calibration tools and a bovine serum albumin (BSA) reference sample were shared among 67 laboratories, generating 129 comprehensive data sets. These allowed for an assessment of many parameters of instrument performance, including accuracy of the reported scan time after the start of centrifugation, the accuracy of the temperature calibration, and the accuracy of the radial magnification. The range of sedimentation coefficients obtained for BSA monomer in different instruments and using different optical systems was from 3.655 S to 4.949 S, with a mean and standard deviation of (4.304 ± 0.188) S (4.4%). After the combined application of correction factors derived from the external calibration references for elapsed time, scan velocity, temperature, and radial magnification, the range of s-values was reduced 7-fold with a mean of 4.325 S and a 6-fold reduced standard deviation of ± 0.030 S (0.7%). In addition, the large data set provided an opportunity to determine the instrument-to-instrument variation of the absolute radial positions reported in the scan files, the precision of photometric or refractometric signal magnitudes, and the precision of the calculated apparent molar mass of BSA monomer and the fraction of BSA dimers. These results highlight the necessity and effectiveness of independent calibration of basic AUC data dimensions for reliable quantitative studies.
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/70478
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.rightsAuthor/s retain copyrighten_AU
dc.sourcePLOS ONE (Public Library of Science)
dc.titleA multilaboratory comparison of calibration accuracy and the performance of external references in analytical ultracentrifugation
dc.typeJournal article
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue5
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage30
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1
local.contributor.affiliationZhao, Huaying, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
local.contributor.affiliationGhirlando, Rodolfo, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
local.contributor.affiliationAlfonso, Carlos, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas
local.contributor.affiliationArisaka, Fumio, Nihon University
local.contributor.affiliationAttali, Ilan, Tel Aviv University
local.contributor.affiliationBain, David L., University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus
local.contributor.affiliationBakhtina, Marina M., The Ohio State University
local.contributor.affiliationBecker, Donald F., University of Nebraska-Lincoln
local.contributor.affiliationBedwell, Gregory J., University of Alabama at Birmingham
local.contributor.affiliationBekdemir, Ahmet, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
local.contributor.affiliationHall, Damien, College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidHall, Damien, u5468311
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor039904 - Organometallic Chemistry
local.identifier.absfor030503 - Organic Chemical Synthesis
local.identifier.absfor030701 - Quantum Chemistry
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB2324
local.identifier.citationvolume10
local.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0126420
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84930615100
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Zhao_A_multilaboratory_comparison_2015.pdf
Size:
1.68 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format