Revegetation in agricultural areas: development of structural complexity and floristic diversity

dc.contributor.authorMunro, Nicolaen_AU
dc.contributor.authorFischer, Joernen_AU
dc.contributor.authorWood, Jeffreyen_AU
dc.contributor.authorLindenmayer, David Ben_AU
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T22:32:31Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T10:50:17Z
dc.description.abstractRevegetation plantings have been established to ameliorate the negative effects of clearing remnant vegetation and to provide new habitat for fauna. We assessed the vegetation development of revegetation established on agricultural land in Gippsland, southeastern Australia. We compared (1) woodlot plantings (overstory eucalypts only) and (2) ecological plantings (many species of local trees, shrubs, and understory) with remnants and paddocks for development of vegetation structural complexity and colonizing plant species. We also assessed structural complexity and plant species composition in response to several site parameters. Structural complexity increased with age of planting, toward that of remnants, even when very few species were planted at establishment. Richness of all plants and native plants, however, did not increase with age. Native ground cover plants were not included at establishment in either planting type, and their richness also did not increase with age of planting. This indicated that colonization did not occur through time, which does not support the "foster ecosystem hypothesis." Weed species richness was unrelated to native plant richness, which does not support the "diversity-resistance hypothesis." Weed cover increased with age of planting in woodlot plantings but decreased with age in ecological plantings. Richness of all plants and native plants in plantings did not increase with planting size or with the presence of old remnant trees and was greater in gullies and where vegetation cover in the landscape was greater. Structural complexity was unaffected by planting size but was positively correlated with floristic richness. Ecological plantings had higher condition scores, greater shrub cover, more plant life-forms and fewer weeds than woodlot plantings indicating a possible greater benefit as habitat for wildlife. We conclude that ecological plantings can achieve similar overall structural complexity as remnant vegetation within 30-40 years but will not gain a native ground layer and will not necessarily contain some important structural features by this age. Ecological plantings may provide habitat for the conservation of fauna (through the development of structural complexity), but they may not provide for the conservation of non-planted flora (given the absence of re-colonizing smaller life-forms).
dc.identifier.issn1051-0761
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/55799
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherEcological Society of America
dc.sourceEcological Applications
dc.subjectKeywords: agricultural land; colonization; community composition; evergreen tree; floristics; forest ecosystem; overstory; restoration ecology; revegetation; shrub; species conservation; vegetation structure; article; Australia; biodiversity; ecosystem; environment Diversity-resistance hypothesis; Floristic richness; Foster ecosystem hypothesis; Restoration: revegetation: seral stages; Vegetation structural complexity
dc.titleRevegetation in agricultural areas: development of structural complexity and floristic diversity
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue5
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1210
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1197
local.contributor.affiliationMunro, Nicola, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationFischer, Joern, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationWood, Jeffrey, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationLindenmayer, David, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidMunro, Nicola, u4095927
local.contributor.authoruidFischer, Joern, u4021453
local.contributor.authoruidWood, Jeffrey, u4039956
local.contributor.authoruidLindenmayer, David, u8808483
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor050104 - Landscape Ecology
local.identifier.absfor050207 - Environmental Rehabilitation (excl. Bioremediation)
local.identifier.ariespublicationU4279067xPUB340
local.identifier.citationvolume19
local.identifier.doi10.1890/08-0939.1
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-68149089865
local.identifier.thomsonID000267020200011
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Munro_Revegetation_in_agricultural_2009.pdf
Size:
1.29 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format