Student outcomes of the physical education and physical literacy (PEPL) approach

dc.contributor.authorTelford, Rohan M.en
dc.contributor.authorOlive, Lisa S.en
dc.contributor.authorKeegan, Richard J.en
dc.contributor.authorKeegan, Sarahen
dc.contributor.authorBarnett, Lisa M.en
dc.contributor.authorTelford, Richard D.en
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-25T08:23:45Z
dc.date.available2025-05-25T08:23:45Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-03en
dc.description.abstractBackground: Health organisations such as the United Nations continue to place an expectation on school physical education (PE) programmes and wider school strategies to ensure students develop physical literacy and receive the well-established benefits of meeting physical activity guidelines. Barriers to meet this expectation such as lack of trained PE teachers, lack of time and greater emphasis on academic achievement are ongoing challenges to schools. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the multi-component Physical Education Physical Literacy (PEPL) intervention, designed to improve students’ fundamental movement skill, perceived physical abilities and level of physical activity. Method: A qualified PE teacher implemented the PEPL intervention across seven schools, and another seven schools formed a control group as part of a randomised cluster-based trial. Grade 5 students (N = 318, age 10.4 years ± SD 0.4) completed assessments of physical activity, fundamental movement skill, attitudes towards PE, and self-perceptions of physical abilities before and after a 33-week intervention. Intervention effects were examined using general linear mixed models. Post-intervention focus groups with students were used to develop insights into experiences and outcomes. Results: With no significant gender interactions, the PEPL approach led to enhanced object control skills (β = 1.62; SE = 0.61; p = 0.008), with little evidence of any other fundamental movement skill improvements in excess of those in the control group. There was also modest evidence for an effect on accelerometer measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) during school time (β = 4.50; SE = 2.39; p = 0.058), but this was not accompanied by any significant intervention effect over the entire week. Questionnaires indicated students in the PEPL programme became less satisfied with their own sporting ability (β = −0.20; SE = 0.08; p = 0.013) but qualitative data analyses suggested that they enjoyed the PEPL approach experience, becoming more motivated and confident in their physical abilities. Conclusions: Evidence of enhanced object control skill, increased confidence and motivation to be physically active, and moderate evidence of more MVPA during school time, indicate that the introduction of the PEPL approach contributed to the development of student physical literacy. A decrease in perceived sporting competence warrants greater attention on student’s self-perceptions in future iterations of the intervention. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry identifier: ACTRN12615000066583.en
dc.description.sponsorshipWe acknowledge the energy, passion and dedication of the PEPL coach, Ron Rooney and the generosity and time given by the participating schools, staff and students. We also acknowledge the underlying stimulus for this study, the Australian Lifestyle of our Kids (LOOK) longitudinal project and the support provided to it by the Commonwealth Education Trust (London) and Bluearth Foundation (Melbourne). Authors’ contributions. RDT, RMT and LO originated the idea for this study. RMT, RDT, LO, RK and SK contributed to the study design and data collection. LB was responsible for the fundamental movement skill methodology and data collection. RMT performed the quantitative data analysis and drafted the initial manuscript. RK performed the qualitative data collection and analysis and all authors reviewed, and approved drafts of this manuscript including the final version. Ethics approval and consent to participate. All parents provided written consent for their child prior to participation. This study was approved by the University of Canberra Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC 14-210). This study was funded by the Department of Education and Training Victoria, School Sport Victoria, Cricket Australia and the Australian Sports Commission. We acknowledge the energy, passion and dedication of the PEPL coach, Ron Rooney and the generosity and time given by the participating schools, staff and students. We also acknowledge the underlying stimulus for this study, the Australian Lifestyle of our Kids (LOOK) longitudinal project and the support provided to it by the Commonwealth Education Trust (London) and Bluearth Foundation (Melbourne). Authors? contributions. RDT, RMT and LO originated the idea for this study. RMT, RDT, LO, RK and SK contributed to the study design and data collection. LB was responsible for the fundamental movement skill methodology and data collection. RMT performed the quantitative data analysis and drafted the initial manuscript. RK performed the qualitative data collection and analysis and all authors reviewed, and approved drafts of this manuscript including the final version. Ethics approval and consent to participate. All parents provided written consent for their child prior to participation. This study was approved by the University of Canberra Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC 14-210).en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent14en
dc.identifier.otherScopus:85088962519en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-1723-2559/work/171154469en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088962519&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733753294
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsPublisher Copyright: © 2020 Association for Physical Education.en
dc.sourcePhysical Education and Sport Pedagogyen
dc.subjectcoachen
dc.subjectFundamental movement skillsen
dc.subjectMVPAen
dc.subjectobject controlen
dc.subjectphysical activityen
dc.titleStudent outcomes of the physical education and physical literacy (PEPL) approachen
dc.typeJournal articleen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage110en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage97en
local.contributor.affiliationTelford, Rohan M.; National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, ANU College of Law, Governance and Policy, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationOlive, Lisa S.; Research School of Psychology, School of Medicine and Psychology, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationKeegan, Richard J.; University of Canberraen
local.contributor.affiliationKeegan, Sarah; University of Canberraen
local.contributor.affiliationBarnett, Lisa M.; Deakin Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationTelford, Richard D.; Medical School -Administration, ANU College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.identifier.citationvolume26en
local.identifier.doi10.1080/17408989.2020.1799967en
local.identifier.pure7c368d99-0341-4c8e-b7f4-f88e9d977365en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads