A review of crust and upper mantle structure beneath the Indian subcontinent

Abstract

This review presents an account of the variations in crustal and upper mantle structure beneath the Indian subcontinent and its environs, with emphasis on passive seismic results supplemented by results using controlled seismic sources. Receiver function results from more than 600 seismic stations, and over 10,000 km of deep seismic profiles have been exploited to produce maps of average crustal velocities and thickness across the region. The crustal thickness varies from 29 km at the southern tip of India to 88 km under the Himalayan collision zone, and the patterns of variation show significant deviations from the predictions of global models. The average crustal shear velocity (Vs) is low in the Himalaya–Tibet collision zone compared to Indian shield. Major crustal features are as follows: (a) the Eastern Dharwar Craton has a thinner and simpler crustal structure crust than the Western Dharwar Craton, (b) Himalayan crustal thickness picks clearly follow a trend with elevation, (c) the rift zones of the Godavari graben and Narmada–Son Lineament show deeper depths of crust than their surroundings, and (d) most of the Indian cratonic fragments, Bundelkhand, Bhandara and Singhbhum, show thick crust in comparison to the Eastern Dharwar Craton. Heat flow and crustal thickness estimates do not show any positive correlations for India. Estimates of the thickness of the lithosphere show large inconsistencies among various techniques not only in terms of thickness but also in the nature of the transition to the asthenosphere (gradual or sharp). The lithosphere beneath India shows signs of attrition and preservation in different regions, with a highly heterogeneous nature, and does not appear to have been thinned on broader scale during India's rapid motion north towards Asia. The mantle transition zone beneath India is predominantly normal with some clear variations in the Himalayan region (early arrivals) and Southwest Deccan Volcanic Province and Southern Granulite Terrain (delayed arrivals). No clear patterns on influence on the mantle transition zone discontinuities can be associated with lithospheric thickness. Over 1000 anisotropic splitting parameters from SKS/SKKS phases and 139 using direct S waves are available from various studies. The shear-wave splitting results clearly show the dominance of absolute-plate-motion related strain of a highly anisotropic Indian lithospheric mantle with delay times between the split S phases close to 1 s. There are still many parts of India where there is, at best, limited information on the character of the crust and the mantle beneath. It is to be hoped that further installations of permanent and temporary stations will fill these gaps and improve understanding of the geodynamic environment of the Indian subcontinent.