Grammar rules, OK? What works when teaching a highly endangered Aboriginal language versus a stronger language?

dc.contributor.authorGale, Mary-Anneen
dc.contributor.authorAustralian Linguistic Societyen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-19T03:21:41Z
dc.date.available2012-09-19T03:21:41Z
dc.date.created2012-10en_AU
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the pedagogy of teaching an Aboriginal language under revival such as Ngarrindjeri, versus a stronger language, such as Pitjantjatjara—both languages of South Australia. It challenges the current recommended methodologies based on theory inspired by teaching European and Asian languages, which are invariably spoken fluently by language teachers. These communicative and/or functional approaches are often not possible for the revival situation, particularly if there are no fluent speakers or teachers, and the main source of language texts are written. For this reason, the use of the traditional Grammar Translation Method, once used successfully to teach text-based languages such as Latin and Classical Greek, is arguably a very useful approach for the revival situation. The paper explores the different approaches to teaching languages, and challenges teachers’ fears of criticism from advisers driven by theory that sees ‘eclectic’ as a dirty word.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipANU College of Arts & Social Sciences, School of Language Studies; ANU College of Asia and the Pacific, School of Culture, History and Languageen_AU
dc.format.extent22 pagesen_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.citationGale, M.-A. (2012). Grammar rules, OK? What works when teaching a highly endangered Aboriginal language versus a stronger language? In M. Ponsonnet, L. Dao & M. Bowler (Eds), Proceedings of the 42nd Australian Linguistic Society Conference – 2011, Australian National University, Canberra ACT, 2-4 December 2011 (pp. 75-96)en_AU
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-9802815-4-5en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/9397
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceCopyright remains with the author. Permission has been given to deposit this paper and make it publicly available - emails from editor of proceedings, dated 30/08/12 and 8/10/12en_AU
dc.publisherAustralian Linguistic Societyen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Linguistic Society Conferenceen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAustralian Linguistic Society Conference: 42nden_AU
dc.rightsAuthor/s retain copyrighten_AU
dc.sourceProceedings of the 42nd Australian Linguistic Society Conference 2011en_AU
dc.source.urihttp://langfest.anu.edu.au/index.php/als/als2011en_AU
dc.subjectlanguage revivalen_AU
dc.subjectgrammar translation methoden_AU
dc.subjectNgarrindjerien_AU
dc.subjectPitjantjatjaraen_AU
dc.subjectlanguage teaching methodologyen_AU
dc.subjectlanguage pedagogyen_AU
dc.titleGrammar rules, OK? What works when teaching a highly endangered Aboriginal language versus a stronger language?en_AU
dc.typeConference paperen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
local.contributor.affiliationGale, Mary-Anne, University of Adelaide, Mobile Language Teamen_AU
local.contributor.authoremailmaryanne.gale@adelaide.edu.auen_AU
local.description.notesThe conference proceedings can be found at http://hdl.handle.net/1885/9404. "The 2011 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society was ... hosted jointly by the School of Language Studies and the School of Culture, History and Language. The Conference convenors were Jane Simpson and Nicholas Evans" - from Proceedings, Editorial Noteen_AU
local.description.refereedYes
local.identifier.uidSubmittedByu4695728en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.als.asn.auen_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Gale_GrammarRules2012.pdf
Size:
341.21 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
68 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: