Fatal attraction? Research assessment, publications and University rankings

dc.contributor.authorSteele, Colinen_US
dc.date.accessioned2004-11-10en_US
dc.date.accessioned2005-03-10en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-05T08:33:09Z
dc.date.available2011-01-05T08:33:09Z
dc.date.created2004en_US
dc.description.abstract[Conclusion:] This all may seem a long way from the euphoria or depression of university rankings. In an ideal world university league tables should be relegated to the intellectual basement but this is clearly not going to happen, rather the reverse. In that process of ranking universities there is a clear need for coordinated analysis of the methodologies, the need to establish improved data for comparative purposes and most importantly, a wider examination of the implications for scholarly research itself. Otherwise the current “Wizards of Oz” could reach the same conclusion as Dorothy on the bibliometric yellow brick road?en_US
dc.format.extent99930 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent363 bytesen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/octet-streamen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/42679en_US
dc.language.isoen_AUen_US
dc.subjectscholarly assessmenten_AU
dc.subjectscholarly publicationsen_AU
dc.subjectUniversity league tablesen_AU
dc.subjectresearch assessmenten_AU
dc.subjectUniversity rankingsen_AU
dc.titleFatal attraction? Research assessment, publications and University rankingsen_US
dc.typeNewspaper/magazine articleen_US
local.description.notesA longer version of the article Ranking mania reflects distortion of priorities published in The Australian newspaper November 10, 2004en_US
local.description.refereednoen_US
local.identifier.citationmonthnoven_US
local.identifier.citationyear2004en_US
local.identifier.eprintid2834en_US
local.rights.ispublishedyesen_US

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Australian_article.pdf
Size:
97.59 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Author/s version