ANU Open Research Repository will be unavailable 8am-9am on Tuesday 13th August 2024 due to scheduled maintenance.
 

Rod Formation of Ionic Surfactants: Electrostatic and Conformational Energies

dc.contributor.authorBauer, A
dc.contributor.authorWoelki, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorKohler, Hans Helmut
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-13T22:41:11Z
dc.date.available2015-12-13T22:41:11Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.date.updated2015-12-11T10:00:17Z
dc.description.abstractWe present a thermodynamic model that describes the formation of micelles from ionic surfactants in aqueous solution at varying counterion concentrations. The micellar aggregates may be spheres, dumbbells, and rods. A former theory [Heindl, A.; Kohler, H.-H. Langmuir 1996, 12, 2464] is refined by the introduction of detailed models for the conformational energy of the surfactant chains and the electrostatic interaction of the ionic headgroups. The standard Gibbs energy of a surfactant ion is minimized under constraints imposed by the micelle shape. The conformational energy is calculated from an appropriately modified single-chain mean-field model proposed in another work [Ben-Shaul, A.; Gelbart, W. M. In Membranes, Microemulsions and Monolayers; 1994]. For the electrostatic interactions, we use a previously developed local balance model for a charged interface [Woelki, S.; Kohler, H.-H. Chem. Phys. 2000, 267, 411-419; 421-438]. This leads to a marked counterion specificity of the standard Gibbs energies of the micelles. Interfacial tension, steric headgroup repulsion, and direct counterion adsorption are taken into consideration. From the standard Gibbs energies, the size distribution of the micelles can be obtained by application of the law of mass action. This distribution is used to calculate the viscosity of the micellar solution at a given concentration of surfactant and salt. A single fitting parameter - the counterion dissociation constant - is used to fit the model to experimental viscosity data for cetylpyridinium chloride, bromide, iodide, and nitrate. It is shown that two alternative models for the shape of the rods can be used to explain the observed counterion specificity.
dc.identifier.issn1520-6106
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/78403
dc.publisherAmerican Chemical Society
dc.sourceJournal of Physical Chemistry B
dc.subjectKeywords: Adsorption; Concentration (process); Conformations; Dissociation; Electrostatics; Mathematical models; Micelles; Molecular dynamics; Nitrates; Parameter estimation; Particle size analysis; Polyelectrolytes; Solutions; Thermodynamics; Viscosity of liquids;
dc.titleRod Formation of Ionic Surfactants: Electrostatic and Conformational Energies
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue6
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage2037
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage2028
local.contributor.affiliationBauer, A, College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationWoelki, Stefan, University of Regensburg
local.contributor.affiliationKohler, Hans Helmut, University of Regensburg
local.contributor.authoremailrepository.admin@anu.edu.au
local.contributor.authoruidBauer, A, u3581218
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.description.refereedYes
local.identifier.absfor020404 - Electronic and Magnetic Properties of Condensed Matter; Superconductivity
local.identifier.ariespublicationMigratedxPub7056
local.identifier.citationvolume108
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-1342323580
local.identifier.uidSubmittedByMigrated
local.type.statusPublished Version

Files