Tools for grading evidence: strengths, weaknesses, and the impact on effective knowledge translation
Loading...
Date
Authors
Irving, Michelle
Cherbuin, Nic
Eramudugolla, Ranmalee
Butterworth, Peter
O'Donoughue Jenkins, Lily
Anstey, Kaarin
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Australian National University
Abstract
Rating evidence and knowledge translation: Could grading tools be selling us short?
Knowledge Translation is defined by the World Health Organization as “the synthesis, exchange, and application of knowledge by relevant stakeholders to accelerate the benefits of global and local innovation in strengthening health systems and improving people’s health” (WHO, 2005).
This objective is compromised when a body of research is oversimplified, graded incorrectly, or not fully understood by those relying on flawed grading systems to inform their decision making.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Irving, M., Cherbuin, N., Eramudugolla, R., Butterworth, P., O'Donoughue Jenkin, L., Anstey, K. (2013). Tools for grading evidence: strengths, weaknesses, and the impact on effective knowledge translation. Digital poster presented at the First Global Conference on Research Integration and Implementation
Source
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
DOI
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description
Published version