Black box, Pandora's box or virtual toolbox? An experiment in a journal's transparent peer review on the web

Date

Authors

Maharg, Paul
Duncan, Nigel

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Abstract

We all accept that peer review is an essential part of journal publication in all disciplines, but almost everyone is agreed that it could be improved. This article describes an experiment in peer review with a legal education journal The Law Teacher. It reports on the process, and describes ways in which the process can be improved for the future.

Description

Citation

Source

International Review of Law, Computers & Technology

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1360-0869/..."author can archive post-print...On institutional repository or subject-based repository after a 18 months embargo" from SHERPA/RoMEO site (as at 8/07/15)

Restricted until

Downloads

File
Description
Author/s accepted manuscript (AAM) / post-print