A lesson in market contestability: calculating the cost of Chinese state intervention in iron ore price negotiations

dc.contributor.authorHurst, Luke
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-12T04:41:26Z
dc.date.available2025-05-12T04:41:26Z
dc.date.issued2015-02
dc.description.abstractThis article analyses the motivation and impact of the 2009 intervention of the China Iron and Steel Association (CISA) in benchmark price negotiations. The impact of the transition from benchmark pricing to a spot market mechanism, which was a consequence of the CISA's intervention, is examined using a constrained bilateral monopoly model to calculate the financial impact of switching pricing mechanisms on Australian exporters and Chinese importers.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733750293
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.provenanceThe publisher permission to make it open access was granted in November 2024
dc.publisherCrawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEABER Working Papers
dc.rightsAuthor(s) retain copyright
dc.sourceThe East Asian Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers
dc.source.urihttps://crawford.anu.edu.au
dc.titleA lesson in market contestability: calculating the cost of Chinese state intervention in iron ore price negotiations
dc.typeWorking/Technical Paper
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EABER-Working-Paper-94-Hurst.pdf
Size:
936.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
882 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: