Resistance and resilience

dc.contributor.authorBennett, Joanne M.en
dc.contributor.authorNimmo, Dale G.en
dc.contributor.authorClarke, Rohan H.en
dc.contributor.authorThomson, James R.en
dc.contributor.authorCheers, Garryen
dc.contributor.authorHorrocks, Gregory F.B.en
dc.contributor.authorHall, Marken
dc.contributor.authorRadford, James Q.en
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Andrew F.en
dc.contributor.authorMac Nally, Ralphen
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-08T12:22:45Z
dc.date.available2025-07-08T12:22:45Z
dc.date.issued2014-11-01en
dc.description.abstractAim: Climate change is expected to increase the frequency and intensity of extreme climatic events, such as severe droughts and intense rainfall periods. We explored how the avifauna of a highly modified region responded to a 13-year drought (the 'Big Dry'), followed by a two-year period of substantially higher than average rainfall (the 'Big Wet'). Location: Temperate woodlands in north central Victoria, Australia. Methods: We used two spatially extensive, long-term survey programmes, each of which was repeated three times: early and late in the Big Dry, and in the Big Wet. We compared species-specific changes in reporting rates between periods in both programmes to explore the resistance (the ability to persist during drought) and resilience (extent of recovery post-drought) of species to climate extremes. Results: There was a substantial decline in the reporting rates of 42-62% (depending on programme) of species between surveys conducted early and late in the Big Dry. In the Big Wet, there was some recovery, with 21-29% of species increasing substantially. However, more than half of species did not recover and 14-27% of species continued to decline in reporting rate compared with early on in the Big Dry. Species' responses were not strongly related to ecological traits. Species resistance to the drought was inversely related to resilience in the Big Wet for 20-35% of the species, while 76-78% of species with low resistance showed an overall decline across the study period. Conclusions: As declines occurred largely irrespective of ecological traits, this suggests a widespread mechanism is responsible. Species that declined the most during the Big Dry did not necessarily show the greatest recoveries. In already much modified regions, climate extremes such as extended drought will induce on-going changes in the biota.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent12en
dc.identifier.issn1366-9516en
dc.identifier.otherScopus:84925351816en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-7883-3577/work/163623804en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733766488
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsPublisher Copyright: © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.en
dc.sourceDiversity and Distributionsen
dc.subjectBig dryen
dc.subjectBig weten
dc.subjectClimate changeen
dc.subjectDegradationen
dc.subjectLand-use changeen
dc.subjectRecoveryen
dc.subjectSpecies traitsen
dc.titleResistance and resilienceen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1332en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1321en
local.contributor.affiliationBennett, Joanne M.; Monash Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationNimmo, Dale G.; Deakin Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationClarke, Rohan H.; Monash Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationThomson, James R.; University of Canberraen
local.contributor.affiliationHorrocks, Gregory F.B.; Monash Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationHall, Mark; Deakin Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationRadford, James Q.; Australian Bush Heritage Funden
local.contributor.affiliationBennett, Andrew F.; Deakin Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationMac Nally, Ralph; University of Canberraen
local.identifier.citationvolume20en
local.identifier.doi10.1111/ddi.12230en
local.identifier.pureab5f68a9-47f7-4b43-9f68-25aba122bff5en
local.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925351816&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads