Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

From service provider to investment platform? The limits of cooperative upgrading in Vietnam

dc.contributor.authorDo, Thang Namen
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Kim Hoanen
dc.contributor.authorLe, Thi Ha Lienen
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Nhat Maien
dc.contributor.authorChu, Longen
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-06T07:40:43Z
dc.date.available2026-07-06T07:40:43Z
dc.date.issued2026en
dc.description.abstractSmallholder farmers in developing countries often face persistent barriers to productive investment arising from fragmented landholdings, limited collateral, and risk-averse decision-making, even where agricultural cooperatives provide valued services. This article examines why locally valued cooperatives struggle to move beyond service provision to mobilise farm investment. Using a mechanism-focused case study in Vietnam, we combine a household survey (n = 52), 15 interviews, financial analysis of irrigation provision, and a review of Vietnam's 2023 Cooperative Law to examine how cooperatives can become trapped in a low-investment equilibrium. While collective irrigation generates measurable cost savings, equality-centred governance, leadership risk aversion, informal land pooling, and subsidy-dependent finance constrain capital formation. More fundamentally, modest and uncertain returns dampen incentives to invest. Governance reform, land pooling, and selective climate-linked finance emerge as conditional pathways rather than straightforward solutions, each involving trade-offs over risk, control, and distribution. Cooperative upgrading is therefore best understood as a constrained and negotiated process rather than a linear transition from service provider to investment platform.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.identifier.issn0743-0167en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-2954-0575/work/219175638en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0001-7365-2219/work/219176536en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-9039-8117/work/219179053en
dc.identifier.scopus105041333657en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733813024
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsPublisher Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s).en
dc.sourceJournal of Rural Studiesen
dc.subjectAgricultural cooperativesen
dc.subjectClimate financeen
dc.subjectCooperative governanceen
dc.subjectInvestment constraintsen
dc.subjectLand fragmentation and poolingen
dc.subjectSmallholder agricultureen
dc.subjectVietnamen
dc.titleFrom service provider to investment platform? The limits of cooperative upgrading in Vietnamen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.contributor.affiliationDo, Thang Nam; The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationNguyen, Kim Hoan; Environment and Marine Sciencesen
local.contributor.affiliationLe, Thi Ha Lien; Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationNguyen, Nhat Mai; The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationChu, Long; The Australian National Universityen
local.identifier.citationvolume126en
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104269en
local.identifier.puref2b687ef-b607-4825-9ddc-481efbe7af7ben
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105041333657en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads

abcd