Statutory Interpretation in Australia : Delegated Legislation
Date
1978
Authors
Pearce, D. C.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Canberra, ACT : The Australian National University
Abstract
Problem of interpretation. Parliaments and other bodies pour out a
steady flow of written laws that affect all our activities. It is thus not
surprising to find that the courts are frequently concerned with cases that
turn upon the meaning of a particular piece of legislation. In Australia, a
rough sample shows that in forty per centum of recent reported cases the
courts were required to rule upon the meaning of some legislative
instrument. In a further thirty per centum of cases the courts had to apply
an Act, regulation, rule, etc., — its meaning this time not being in dispute. 1
It is never easy to express ideas in words and the more complex the idea
the greater the difficulty. That which seems to have been clearly explained
by the writer may not be so found by the reader. There are many reasons
for this. All writing assumes a certain knowledge on the part of the reader,
but the writer may have assumed that his reader knew more than was in
fact the case and as a result the document may be stated too succinctly or
abstrusely. The document may be concerned with something such as a
mathematical calculation that does not readily lend itself to a description in
words. The idea may be so complex that it requires a very large number of
statements, qualifications, exceptions and so on to set it out. Or the writer
may not have foreseen all the subtle variations of human conduct relating to
the topic dealt with in the document and thereby not have provided for
some particular activity. These are but some of the difficulties that
confront both writer and reader of any document and they are all
magnified in regard to legislation.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Type
Thesis (PhD)
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
Restricted access
License Rights
Restricted until
2099-12-31