How should Hong Kong courts rule on the constitutionality of gay sex?
Date
Authors
Ip, Cliff
AsiaPacificQueer Network
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Canberra, ACT: The Australian National University
Abstract
"As the Hong Kong (HK) court held that certain Crimes Ordinance provisions which provided for a different age of consent were unconstitutional in August 2005, a large part of the presented paper no longer seemed very relevant. However, the court did not discuss if cultural relativism and Confucianism were relevant in the judicial analysis. The following seeks to answer this question.
This paper casts doubt on a general cultural relativist argument, as, for example, advocated by Dr. Joseph Chan. If this is wrong, homosexuality may still be compatible with Confucianism, the influential school of thought in HK, because I) the latter can be “re-interpreted” to protect homosexuals‚ interests and II) other Confucian places take homosexual rights more seriously than HK."
Description
Keywords
Citation
Ip, C. (2005, July). How should Hong Kong courts rule on the constitutionality of gay sex? Paper presented at Sexualities, Genders and Rights in Asia: 1st International Conference of Asian Queer Studies. Bangkok, Thailand: AsiaPacifiQueer Network, Mahidol University; Australian National University
Source
Sexualities, genders and rights in Asia : 1st international Conference of Asian Queer Studies, Ambassador Hotel, Bangkok, Thailand 7-9 July 2005
Type
Conference paper
Book Title
Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society 2011
Entity type
Access Statement
Open Access
License Rights
DOI
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description