Papua New Guinea’s 2022 Redistricting Part 1: A Trojan Horse?

dc.contributor.authorHaley, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorOppermann, Thiago Cintra
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-15T22:18:33Z
dc.date.available2024-12-15T22:18:33Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-16
dc.description.abstractWith considerable fanfare, Papua New Guinea (PNG) entered the 2022 National General Election (NGE) with seven new electorates and eight newly defined electorates.1 This was the first time since 1977 that the redistricting provisions foreseen in the Constitution and the Organic Law on National and Local-level Government Elections led to redrawing of open electorates. The new electorates and six more approved for creation ahead of the 2027 NGE were presented as addressing the malapportionment issues stemming from demographic shifts and an electoral map that had remained ostensibly static for 45 years.2 The reform left much to be desired, creating some new electorates with populations well above or well below legislatively prescribed quotas. There was more to this reform than is readily apparent. On 22 March 2022, the National Parliament of Papua New Guinea accepted the 2021 Electoral Boundaries Commission (EBC) report, recommendations and maps, and it turns out this act did much more than establishing 13 new electorates. The report included — without comment — a new set of electorate maps for the 96 proposed open electorates, redrawing open electorate boundaries in nearly every province. Apart from this lack of transparency, another issue is that the new maps are drawn from incompatible sources, creating conflicting open electorate boundaries and some open electorates that are inconsistent with provincial boundaries. This broader redistricting was neither discussed in the EBC report nor debated in parliament. The well-advertised creation of the new electorates concealed much more far-reaching changes.
dc.description.sponsorshipAustralian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
dc.identifier.issn2209-9549
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733730870
dc.publisherCanberra, ACT: Dept. of Pacific Affairs, Coral Bell School of Asia Pacific Affairs, The Australian National University
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDepartment of Pacific Affairs In Brief series
dc.rightsAuthors retain copyright
dc.sourceDepartment of Pacific Affairs In Brief series
dc.subjectPapua New Guinea
dc.subjectRedistricting
dc.titlePapua New Guinea’s 2022 Redistricting Part 1: A Trojan Horse?
dc.typeJournal article
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2024/25
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage2
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1
local.identifier.doi10.25911/2P7H-S758
local.mintdoimint
local.publisher.urlhttps://bellschool.anu.edu.au/dpa
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IB2024_25 Haley and Oppermann.pdf
Size:
867.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
882 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: